The accepted body of knowledge in medicine is already substantial — more than any appointment can fully explore. Beyond that is a whole territory of emerging findings, traditional approaches, and lifestyle and mind-body research that may not fit neatly into a standard treatment protocol. Not because it's fringe. Often because it simply hasn't made it into routine practice yet, or because it sits outside what a prescription pad can address.
That territory is where I spend a lot of my time. I read what's out there, think about what holds up, and write down what seems worth sharing. I find I learn better when I'm writing it down for someone else.
Some articles point to a resource I've examined and think is worthwhile. When they do, I say so — and I tell you exactly what my interest is. That's the arrangement here.
Most hypothyroidism treatment addresses what the thyroid isn't producing. Research increasingly points to why it stopped — and that's a different question entirely.
Read the articleEach page goes deep on one condition — what the research actually says, where the standard picture is incomplete, and what looks worth knowing about.
Most people with heart disease had "normal" cholesterol. LDL particle size, oxidation, and inflammation tell a more complete story — and the standard panel doesn't capture any of them.
The gut-gout connection — and why the standard dietary advice addresses symptoms, not cause.
→Sodium gets the blame, but research increasingly points to the autonomic nervous system as a central driver of hypertension.
→Chronic inflammation is the engine behind most arthritis pain — and it often originates somewhere standard treatments never address.
→The calcium story is more complicated than the supplement aisle suggests. What the research says about what actually moves the needle.
→CKD research keeps pointing back to the gut. What researchers are finding about the microbiome's role in kidney decline.
→Most hypothyroidism is autoimmune. The standard treatment replaces hormones — but doesn't ask why the immune system is attacking the thyroid.
→I didn't start this because I'm skeptical of my doctors — I'm not. I started it because I'm curious, and curiosity doesn't stop at the waiting room door.
What conventional medicine does, it does impressively well. What it isn't designed to do is explore the full landscape. The appointment is structured around established protocols, and that's appropriate — that's exactly what you want when something's wrong. But there's a lot of territory outside those protocols: traditional approaches with real evidence behind them, emerging research that hasn't made it into routine practice yet, mind-body findings that don't fit neatly into a prescription model.
That's the territory I find interesting. I read carefully, I follow citations, and I'm honest about the difference between what's established and what's still emerging. When I come across something I think is genuinely worthwhile — a study, an approach, occasionally a resource I've looked into — I write it up and share it.
More about this site and how it works →I send updates when I have something worth sharing — new research, an article update, occasionally something I think you'd genuinely want to know about. No set schedule, no barrage.
Subscribe on Substack → (Opens in a new tab)No spam. Unsubscribe any time.